|
ACCOMPANIMENT
In 1996 we sent our first
accompanier, a human rights monitor serving as the eyes and ears of the
international community to the Guatemala's La Quetzal,
a community of returned refugees. We
went on to send eight accompaniers there. As the threats began to
change with the announcement of the genocide cases, the risk shifted to
the communities and witnesses involved. UUCAN answered the call and in
2001 we sent our first genocide case accompanier to the Ixil region.
At the height of the 36-year
armed conflict in Guatemala, the period of 1981 to 1983 saw the worst
of the violence under the two military dictatorships of General Lucas
Garcia and afterwards General Rios Montt .
These two administrations devised
and brought to fruition the scorched earth campaign, a military
offensive targeting not individual guerillas but what these governments
viewed as breeding grounds for the movement: rural indigenous
communities living in extreme poverty. As a result some 600 villages
experienced a massacre, half a million people lost their lives or went
missing and many more fled their communities only to suffer further in
the isolated mountains while seeking refuge. Now, as Guatemala
transitions to civilian rule, members of civil society led by CALDH
are pursuing
charges of genocide
and crimes against humanity against the high command of the two
administrations named above. The 22 indigenous Maya communities who
have come forward to bring up these charges run great risks and have
thus asked the international community for human rights accompaniers;
monitors who live among them as a means of safety and security against
whatever violence may be brought against them to prevent these cases
from bringing justice to this war-torn land.
Let's read some reflections
from UUCAN's genocide case accompanier...Renee Wolters:
After two months in the mostly Mayan communities in the Ixcán in
northern Guatemala, I’d like to provide you with some context and
a bit
about my life and experiences here. The ongoing consequences of history
that we as Americans were and are instrumental in carving are ever
present. I live in two quite peaceful jungle villages that have
rebuilt after the violence of a 36-year civil war (funded by the
U.S.—us). For a courageous people who walked from their
homes in the
highlands for a week or more through the mountains and jungle to start
a new life (in the early 70´s), to a piece of land to call their
own,
they succeeded here in the middle of the jungle. The settlers chose to
organize and work cooperatively, growing their own subsistence crops
and marketing cash crops such as coffee and cardamom. For the
first
time in their lives, the residents in these communities were able to
support themselves without working in a type of slave bondage to a
plantation owner.
In the late 70´s activists (catechists, health workers, anyone
suspected of aiding the guerrillas or being one) were targeted by the
military, ie: disappeared, tortured, killed. This was followed in
the
80´s by systematic massacres and the destruction of hundreds of
villages. The war and the massacres changed these successes and
peoples´ lives, as people mourned their dead, fled into the
jungle to
live in CPRs (Communities of Population in Resistance) or escape the
violence to live in Mexico. In the last two months I’ve met
Juan and
his family who bravely evaded the military, continually moving from one
location to another, living for years in the jungle “in
resistance”,
barely surviving on roots and jungle plants. Others, such as
Maria and
José spent years as refugees in Mexico, struggled to retain
their
culture, while learning to speak Spanish. They were politicized
by
United Nations and international NGO (non-governmental organizations)
to know and defend their human rights. Eugenia and others were
caught
by the military, tortured, and forced to live in a village under strict
military control and “reeducation” (indoctrination). They
willingly
tell us their stories. (All names are fictionalized.)
Coming back together after twelve years of very divergent experiences,
these courageous and determined individuals and families rebuilt their
communities, reclaimed their land and literally started over. The
military was still patrolling, land mines were still injuring and
killing people and the land needed to be cleared again to plant maize
and other crops. Today fourteen years after returning to the
villages,
there is an acceptance of the way of life, some resignation, but also a
great appreciation for what they have. By U.S. standards, this
way of
life—daily hauling of drinking water, hauling and chopping of
wood,
working the land with hand tools, living in simple houses (some with
dirt floors), using solar electricity or candles for
lighting—would be
considered quite “primitive”. I’ve been very
fortunate to be present
for the commemoration of the massacre in one village (my first day in
the community!), where students reenacted the massacre, including the
burning of houses and portrayal of soldiers raping women. This
community, not only commemorates the unimaginable suffering of the
massacre and the years in exile, but also celebrates the return to the
community after twelve years in hiding or as refugees. The other
community, composed of returned refugees and those who stayed behind in
the “model village”, recently celebrated 38 years of
existence since
the trek from their mountain villages in the 70´s. I was
fortunate to
be present for both of these celebrations.
The people are quite happy that their life today is peaceful and calm;
however there are signs that not all is paradise here. There is a
notable absence of young men in the communities due to a high rate of
migration to “El Norte”. Leaving out of economic
necessity, they
subsidize the subsistence economy by sending remittances back to their
families. I often see women on mountain tops (where there is a
signal), talking on cell phones to their spouses or children who are
away working—they live in long distance relationships, often for
years. Not seeing John for weeks at a time pales in comparison.
Women
are left behind to raise children and assume the responsibility of the
household. They express concern for their loved ones who live in fear
of immigration officials, work in low-paying jobs (gardening,
harvesting crops, manual labor, meat packing, etc.), and daily
experience discrimination. Migrants who return to the community express
an appreciation for the life they live here. I can understand
their
appreciation—here there is virtually no traffic and very little
crime,
abundance of locally grown food, and a community full of supportive
family and friends. They say they wouldn’t ever leave their homes
if it
weren’t for economic necessity, and ask of us as U.S. citizens to
work
to pass just immigration laws, something I feel we can and must do to
favorably impact the injustices immigrants live with every day.
There are other problems here too. The government, with funding
from
international financial institutions such as the World Bank, is
planning the Xalalá hydroelectric dam in the area that would
adversely
affect residents in a large area, submerging some villages. Whether the
local population living without electricity would benefit from the dam
is questionable. I am told that corporate (Lockheed Martin) and
U.S.
government entities (Sandia National Laboratories) are making inroads
into the Ixcán in an effort to control sources of alternative
energy.
Exploitation of gas and oil threaten the water supply and the very
existence of these campesinos. In other areas of the country,
transnational mining companies, such as Goldcorp, extract metals and
reap the profits while the locals live with the ensuing environmental
degradation.
As far as being a human rights accompanier in the communities here, I
have never met people more friendly or kind. We eat in their
homes
every day, usually simply prepared and delicious food served with the
best tortillas I’ve ever eaten. They provide us with living
quarters
and express their gratitude to us for our presence, for the
“protection” we offer them. A Guatemalan judge has recently
started to
hear testimony from a number of witnesses in the genocide case that
originated in Spain, and this week the Constitutional Court has
determined that military records from the 80’s (that include
massacre
plans) are no longer considered a security threat and can be opened for
use in the cases. Progress made after years of struggle is being
made.
Providing accompaniment so that those who struggle for justice and
defend human rights have a space in which to advance their struggle is
necessary. We wouldn’t be able to do this if it
weren’t for the
ongoing support of our sponsoring communities, and friends and family,
who have and continue to offer moral and financial support. Thank you
all for being part of this network of caring individuals!
Saludos,
Renee
|